Thursday, February 28, 2008 

Singers Find New Ways to Get Discovered Without Waiting in Line at American Idol

New websites allow anyone with an internet connection, a microphone, and a webcam to get their shot at stardom. You audition, America decides...

October 6, 2006 - The next American Idol may never be on the show. He or she may never see Randy, Paula, or Simon before building a huge worldwide fan base of their own, getting their own record deal, and becoming a bit of a celebrity. And all this without ever leaving the house.

Websites like Bix.com provide anyone the ability to submit their own video karaoke performance online for free, 24/7. Simply choose the song you want from their list, sing it into your webcam and your video automatically uploads to their site. Next, ask a few friends to vote for you, and suddenly you may find yourself in the running of a major nationwide singing contest, with record label execs watching your every move.

It can be a tremendous boost to your singing career without all the hassle (time, energy, travel) required for American Idol.

I know firsthand what people go through during those tryouts, because I am one of them.

Not sure if it's the "get rich quick" or "overnight success" mentality or just the chance to get on TV, but every year, more than 100,000 people try out for talent shows like American Idol. Add in "Dancing with the Stars," or "Rock Star: Supernova," and that number grows closer to half a million!

People ask me all they time why I tried out. "Why'd you put yourself through all that?" they ask. "Do you really think you're a better singer than the 10,000 other people you stood in line with?"

Truth be told, it's that elusive shot at fame. It's like playing the lottery. You know you can scratch off 100 tickets and still win nothing, but that little voice inside your head says, "Yeah, but what if you try just once more? You just might hit it big."

"What if Simon picks you? What if you make it to the final round and suddenly all of America knows your name and your hometown and just how good you can really sing?"

And so... against all odds, we voluntarily put ourselves through the dreaded tryouts. Here's how mine went:

The alarm clock buzzed again at 4am the morning of the audition, and I subconsciously hit the snooze a couple of times before I remembered what day it was. We grabbed our pre-packed lunches and protein bars and hopped in the car 2 hours before sunrise and sped to the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, where we proceeded to join the cast of thousands of hopefuls already in line. (5:30 am)

After 2 hours in line, the sun started to come up, and we had moved a good 20 feet or so.

Finally, with wristbands intact and stadium seats procured, we got through the gates about 9am, and the boom cameras rolled, taking shot after cheesy shot of a falsely hyped-up crowd pretending to be ecstatic to be there. (Side note: it's awfully hard to act energetic when you've been on your feet for 5 or 6 hours straight with the August sun beating down on you.)

More time ticked by... Some people were singing. Some were blabbering about how great they were and how they shouldn't even have to try out. One guy proclaimed he could have easily been in the top 5 finalists last year. It's just that his voice got "a little dry" when he first auditioned... riiight...

So we sat and sat, in cramped little Rose Bowl stadium seats built for skinny short people, baking in the Southern California sun until about 1pm, when they finally called our group number. I stood in a group of 4 pretty darn good singers, complete with catchy outfits and good looks to match. We each took our turn in front of a junior producer at one of 14 booths lined up on the opposite side of the stadium, trying to sing loud enough to wow the judge over the neighboring booths.

I belted out Amazing Grace to the best of my ability. Complete with bluesy slides in my own unique arrangement I'd never heard anyone do before, sure that they'd appreciate my throwback to Otis Redding and Sam Cooke.

But my best effort just wasn't good enough for this producer. In fact, no one from our group got through. Maybe it was the heat or the dehydration. Maybe the producer we got was just having a bad day. Either way, I went to all that effort for nothing. Or so I thought...

On the way out of the stadium, thoroughly exhausted and sunburned, someone handed me an invitation to try out for something called an "Online Second Chance" contest. A bit jaded from the whole experience, I said, "Thanks but no thanks," and kept walking.

I let that invitation sit on my desk for a month before I finally picked it up and went to the website. When I realized what a cool opportunity this was, I had to rush, because there were only 9 days left in the contest.

Within 72 hours, my audition skyrocketed. People discovered me! My version of the song "Chariot" (Gavin DeGraw) took second place in the Audio category, which made me a Top 10 Finalist overall, heading into the final round, where I'm competing right now against 9 other finalists.

This time I'm singing another Gavin DeGraw hit called "I Don't Want to Be."

I'm still pinching myself, but in the last 3 weeks, I've earned over 1,500 new fans, emailed back and forth with record label execs, and am competing for a cash prize that will more than pay for a real record in a real studio with a real producer. Not bad for never leaving the house.

If you are - or have ever wanted to be a singer - I recommend you take your shot online.

To view my Bix.com submission and vote, visit http://www.bix.com/entry/9015. But hurry, the contest ends Oct 14.

Nick Daugherty is a Los Angeles-based singer/songwriter who is rapidly gaining notoriety as a vocalist with a talent for songwriting. He is the author of a current video/weblog project called How to Get A Record Deal in 365 Days.

Read This Blog
Read This Blog
MP3DownloadNet. ($11 Rebate)
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
MP3Must.com. ($11 Rebate)
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
AllMyGreeks.com
Read This Blog
My Psp Downloads - Earn A Massive 75%. ($11 Rebate)
Read This Blog

 

The HD Media Future

The HD Media future

Everyone knows that media format wars have historical significance in the world of technology. Remember the most notorious battle between the Beta max and the VHS? The winner of such battles will make millions even billions. Later we had the upgrade of tape to CD, a revolution in music. In 1980 the Philips/Sony compact disc standard was finalized and nobody has looked back for the last 26 years (until mp3's came along).

Well as ever there is a new media battle but who will win again is yet unknown. This modern forest of technological mass has produced a new insurgency: THE HIGH DEFINITION WAR. Blu-ray vs HD-DVD are two competing formats which are eventually going to replace DVD's. As you look around at your local electric retailers you can see changes happening in the broadcast world, not only are we changing from our conventional CRT screens to Flat screen but also to HD ready TV. The impact this has on our lives is not as large as black and white to colour, but nevertheless a change that will definitely be a benchmark for future media.

Why New formats?

The reason we have introduced these new formats is that your traditional DVD can hold a maximum of 9.4 GB (Dual Layer) of information. This is not enough for HD broadcast as the information required is higher, being a resolution of 1920x1080. Blu-ray discs can hold 50 GB (Dual Layer) and HD-DVD 30 GB (Dual Layer).

These new discs cannot be played on normal DVD players but on new HD media players of which examples are Samsung BDP 1000 (Blu-Ray), Sony Playstation 3 (Blu-Ray), Toshiba HDXA1 (HD-DVD). This means spending more money for better resolution.

Price

This is always important especially when new models of media come out; at first it is always expensive as supply out strips demand. The players are expensive, the cheapest being the Playstation 3 supposedly retailing at 549. Blu-Ray media also being expensive; similar to DVD's when they first came out (taking inflation into consideration), blank media costing from 11.99 to 24.99.

To play a Blu-ray Disc on a PC has brought about a price concern. The fact that you have to purchase a HDCP (High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection) Graphic card, along with a HD monitor, not to mention a Blu-ray Drive and media, controversially may bring about decrease in sales. This is presently being contested with new Laptops and PCs that are Blu-ray compatible, look at the New Vaio VGN-AR21S.

The HD players need to be up to scratch on price. The Toshiba HD-DVD player retailing at almost half the price of the Blu-ray Samsung player creates even more competition between the two media. This could encourage sales of HD-DVD over Blu-ray, even though it's rumoured that Toshiba will be making a loss initially.

Prices of movies doesn't seem to be as high as anticipated; a Blu-ray movie 'House of flying daggers' from amazon.com will set you back $19.95 (10.68). This may encourage sales. Movies in HD-DVD identical in price, yet Blu-ray is a larger size disc.

Upscaling

Another problem HD may face is that the new DVD players have the upscaling technology ie. DVD is played at 480p but upscalers upgrade the image to 720p or 1080i. This produces a picture which is of high quality to the untrained eye, in fact even the trained eye has difficulty distinguishing between the two. The difference is seen on a 50 inch HD projector and looking right up close. So the question is will 1080p be much different to 1080i? Will people fork out the added expense when they know that a cheaper DVD upscaler will create more or less the same effect?

Media Backup

Software and Hardware companies have invested a lot of money in subsidising HD media. Samsung, Panasonic, Mitsubishi, LG, Sony, TDK, JVC and Sharp support Blu-ray and Toshiba and Microsoft back HD-DVD. Hollywood movie studios Disney, Paramount, Warner, Sony, Eagle rock, Fox and MGM and Lions gate support Blu-ray also. None of these large companies would take such a gamble if they didn't know that this is what the consumer wants.

PlayStation 3

Sony love to bring out their own media whether its Sony Duo Sticks or Sony Mini Discs. Their hunger to dominate the consumer market has always been there and this is nothing different. The Playstation 3 will play Blu-Ray discs, still having the ability to play older media like DVDs and CDs. The success of the predecessor's PS1 and PS2 will give much anticipation to the release of this new console and is what Sony are hoping will convert people to use Blu-Ray. A Sony spokesman has predicted that Blu-Ray will dominate the HD market within 12 months.

The encouraging feature with HD-DVD is the name, everyone's ears will ring with the name and automatically assume that this is a high definition movie. Asking someone in the street what 'Blu-ray' is will bring looks of confusion, along with the fact that both will produce similar quality pictures.

Region Coding

Region coding with Blu-Ray may put people off; the fact that you may not be able to watch a new release from the states or Japan on your European locked regional player will raise eyebrows.

REGION 1 South America, North America, East Asia (except China)
REGION 2 Europe and Africa
REGION 3 China, Russia other Countries

Multiregional configurations on DVD players has encouraged sales worldwide especially with worldwide films from Bollywood, Japan (manga) and South America.

So far the HD-DVD camp has not announced region coding just yet, and if they don't then this will be very advantageous for consumers.

Future Proof

Realistically you only need about 15-20 GB for a feature length film in High definition but who would have known that DVD's could not be able to hold enough for high definition. Theoretically they can with MPEG-4 Compression. In any case media like Blu-ray will hopefully be future proof in years to come.

Conclusion

The timescale and price are the two main issues here, how quick we will universally change to HD and whether this is affordable. From a consumer point of view the necessity for HD doesn't seem imperative, after all VHS was around for 20 odd years twice that of DVD (so far). You could argue that technology is changing exponentially and that changes occur quicker.

As for the battle between the two media there may be compromise ahead. A UK firm has announced a solution to the media war. London-based New Medium Enterprises (NME) has developed a low-cost, multilayer DVD disc that can store Blu-ray content on one layer and HD DVD content on another. This would leave the consumer with the choice of buying either type of player to play the one disc.

The key setback I feel with the looming HD change is the cheaper alternative to a Blu-Ray player or HD-DVD player, the DVD upscaler. Do people want to get rid of those hundreds of DVDs they bought to replace them with an expensive alternative, especially when they might not even notice the difference in picture quality?

However I do feel that HD is encouraged with consoles such as the Playstation 3. Blu-ray is its main format and may revolutionise the games industry.

Jay Jeetley is a writer for the website http://www.Blu-raychoice.com, a resource for Blu-ray News, movies, forums and media.

Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog
Read This Blog

About me

  • I'm free42656
  • From
My profile

Links

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates